public comment
is a mechanism that is already built in to the federal rule-making process. Federal agencies implement laws passed by Congress through rules and regulations. When any federal agency needs to create a new regulation, it starts with a regulation proposal in the Federal Register. Under the Administrative Procedures Act (1946), the agency is then required to request comments on that proposal by all members of the public.
This video by Rachel Minji Lee is licensed under CC BY 4.0
Agencies are looking for any information pertinent to the actions proposed in the regulation, from public input on community impacts to scientific research. This means that public comment is utilized not only by private citizens, but also by non-profit organizations, industry lobbying groups, and even other government agencies. The agency is then required to take into account and respond to substantive comments when writing the final regulation. These responses are also published in the Federal Register. Agencies may also solicit public comment outside of proposed rules, for example, when soliciting information for a potential regulation or simply gathering information on a particular topic.
how do scientists fit in?
“The need for scientific and technical inputs exceeds what can be provided from panels of scientists tasked with discrete analyses, which are often generated over months and years. Scientific input to policy-makers should be dynamic and continuous, provided by scientists who span various disciplines and career stages.”
-AAAS 2017 Report: Connecting Scientists to Policy Around the World
Scientists can think of public comment as a type of peer review for federal regulations. And as with scientific peer review, the most effective and helpful reviewers are those that demonstrate expert understanding of the issue and support positions with substantive data.
Scientists have developed a unique expertise in their respective fields. They are trained to analyze and synthesize data and to navigate the technical context in which their own work takes place. They can consolidate and communicate research that is critical to evidence-based policy.
All agencies incorporate scientific data throughout the rule-making process, and many structure substantial scientific review prior to the comment period through advisory boards and committees. However, the extent and timing of this review varies by statute and agency, and so it is often unclear how an independent scientist can plug into this process. Public comment is an invaluable gateway to plug in to the regulatory process because it is required of all agencies, across statutes, for any new regulation. It casts a wider net for collecting scientific information by encouraging participation by scientists across disciplines, sectors, and career states. And because public comments can be submitted online and comment periods tend to last weeks to months, scientists can support evidence-based policy at their own pace and on their own schedule.
the rule-making process
Public comment is just one part of an extensive rule-making process. While the specifics of rule-making can vary between federal agencies and by the subject of the regulation, the figure below outlines the general process.